Merge pull request #360 from simonduq/fix/comments
Fix a number of comments in rpl-lite/rpl-timers.c
This commit is contained in:
commit
fb9e67bcb4
@ -257,8 +257,8 @@ void
|
||||
rpl_timers_schedule_dao(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if(curr_instance.used && curr_instance.mop != RPL_MOP_NO_DOWNWARD_ROUTES) {
|
||||
/* No need for aggregation delay as per RFC 6550 section 9.5, as this only
|
||||
* serves storing mode. Use simply delay instead, with the only PURPOSE
|
||||
/* No need for DAO aggregation delay as per RFC 6550 section 9.5, as this
|
||||
* only serves storing mode. Use simple delay instead, with the only purpose
|
||||
* to reduce congestion. */
|
||||
clock_time_t expiration_time = RPL_DAO_DELAY / 2 + (random_rand() % (RPL_DAO_DELAY));
|
||||
/* Increment next seqno */
|
||||
@ -306,8 +306,10 @@ handle_dao_timer(void *ptr)
|
||||
rpl_icmp6_dao_output(curr_instance.default_lifetime);
|
||||
|
||||
#if !RPL_WITH_DAO_ACK
|
||||
/* There is DAO-ACK, schedule a refresh. Must be done after rpl_icmp6_dao_output,
|
||||
because we increment curr_instance.dag.dao_curr_seqno for the next DAO (refresh) */
|
||||
/* There is no DAO-ACK, schedule a refresh. Must be done after rpl_icmp6_dao_output,
|
||||
because we increment curr_instance.dag.dao_curr_seqno for the next DAO (refresh).
|
||||
Where there is DAO-ACK, the refresh is scheduled after reception of the ACK.
|
||||
Happens when handle_dao_timer is called again next. */
|
||||
schedule_dao_refresh();
|
||||
#endif /* !RPL_WITH_DAO_ACK */
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user